data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62955/62955bd0211adc26afcb648215595a8e7dcdb106" alt=""
Anyway, I love Rachel Comey. Her stuff is sold at Steven Alan and Creatures of Comfort, but Impulse in Seattle also carries the line. Interestingly enough, Anthropologie also carries her shoes, though they are so very sneaky and won't attribute the designer. This can be a good thing when the design is a bit "interesting" and expensive, because often it'll be marked down considerably. And then those who know can swoop in and snatch them up. Case in point, these Rachel Comey peep-toe purple suede flats that I am considering:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a846/3a846cfcbcab104aa4dacf0e683c8a99153a4783" alt=""
Honestly, I didn't even notice these the first time I was browsing Anthropologie's flats selections. But then I had a little 'aha' moment and remembered that they were Rachel Comey's designs. Here's what I consider a more workable and flattering view of the shoes. Granted, they aren't the same color, but that's ok:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18617/18617ca0665535672d760762fe46a043e50a363a" alt=""
Anyway, this got me started on her shoes again. So I pondered whether this cut-out detail derby shoe might work. Runway shot:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f2fb/9f2fbfedfaf811636ad8a90a8c24978888895169" alt=""
Creatures of Comfort purple suede version, $210, originally $300. Impulse also had a black leather version ages and ages ago which I'm sure has sold out. I think with this kind of shoe, which I would consider a bit too trendy and yet oddly timeless if you're into the Annie Hall androgynous dandy look (kind of, sort of), they might work better in a neutral shade like beige or black. But I love suede, it's softer and more forgiving on my poor feet:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9dcae/9dcaea1cb28ee425d953af1931c77553e50d949e" alt=""
I'm not just obsessed with her shoes (remember those boots from a few months back??).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6faf/a6faf4c78eaf948bed72d0884621249c82c1f801" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39cc1/39cc121126f410d389151c9318f4f5b97e1f983e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2887/d2887b0769cec80215f9962158234034fb456137" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e50a4/e50a434e83000fe39263392e73dd7b4bfb1d53a2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67206/67206077e514c2cb58e9df4d56ef29278983bde4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c49f8/c49f8e97decabe11d62006e5fc75e6e1f56b539e" alt=""
Now for the Spring 2007 collection. I'm a little iffy right now, the prints aren't as deliriously obsessive as the current collection. I do like this collarless light coat, though:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6661/d66618f968515c9d86cd8b3f5ac89bde4485853f" alt=""
I can't quite put my finger on it, but there's something different about this collection. A little more Marni/Dries Van Noten, a little less androgynous punky artsy menswear? Not that there's anything wrong with loose, flowing garments and pseudo ethnic prints, but still. Rachel Comey, what's going on??
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b8e5/6b8e53e4d1d49b85504b2918552f011983237028" alt=""